Do anybody know if there is a management in SC?
hi,
did you get any answers?
netmake never responds to problems, the argument is becoming absurd and unsustainable if so many customers are looking for other avenues after a decade of use.
No, not any reaction…
Hello, @bdl
This feedback is really important to us.
Several improvements are being done to deliver even more reliable versions and updates.
3 Likes
hi roberto,
this sentence was said to me 6 months ago when I asked for new menus as the existing ones are opsolete.
it would be nice to know what the road map of Scriptcase!!!
share what to do in the next versions as they are often useless and maybe customers can give better ideas!
1 Like
Given the issues I’ve had with bugs in the last few years, I recently did a thorough search and evaluation on viable tools that I could use instead of SC. Sadly, they just don’t exist. Not for this price.
Outsystems is an awesome tool, but you are 100% locked in, and while their free tier is free, there are some serious performance limitations. If you want to pay, the first tier is $4000 per MONTH.
Anvil.works was a serious contender. Price wise is reasonable, or free if you want to self host. Basically you do everything in Python and it converts what it needs to to html, js, css etc. It is a solid product. What I found though, is that despite how fast it was to develop, it was still quite a bit slower than SC, with a lot more needing to be hand coded.
What I ended up realizing, is that I can build things out faster with SC, and really I just want them to be more reliable, and yes I would pay more for that to happen.
Now, I ensure that absolutely everything is snapshot backed up every step of the way. And larger applications are actually chuncked out so that if a new SC version has a killer new feature I need, I can upgrade just that application.
So while developing is fast, it is the quality assurance testing of everything that takes just too long, especially when I have little control over the bugs.
There is a phrase used in construction, you can only have any TWO of these three options. Fast, Cheap, Quality. I’d say the same applies in software.
Yes, there are many other options than Outsystems and Anvil, but those were the two that I gave a thorough eval to.
Maybe we need to have a user managed bug bounty system.
We list our bugs and the $ reward for squashing it.
Get the developers motivated to do bug hunting.
I would be in on that.
I need this product to be stable, secure and reliable.
1 Like
hi,
I would like to point out to NETMAKE that we are all senior memebers to address these needs and not customers who have bought a license once, have received money from us for years, we deserve respect!
a list of bugs and resolution times would seem to me the minimum of service to be provided to customers.
we all know that SC is a good product but there are bugs that are making it useless
2 Likes