Scriptcase 9.12 New bugs are coming

Scriptcase 9
#1

Hi Scriptcase.

Why don’t you fix all previous bugs before releasing a new version?

I am still waiting for 9.11 be stable.
There are a lot of bugs in this and previous versions.

Best regards.

5 Likes
#2

Unfortunately, this is what they do. I posted similar messages in the past, didn’t work. More whistles and bells, sells. That’s what matters in the head of the owner(s)

1 Like
#3

The TCPDF Reports not working…

#4

SC arreglen los errores actuales para poder actualizarmos a la actual version.
Necesitamos una version estable para poder tener la tranquilidad de que nuestros proyectos van a trabajar bien.

2 Likes
#5

I reported a MAJOR but about 3 weeks ago, which prevents anybody using MariaDB to create a security module. If you use that database you will not be able to use security unless you custom build your own. After three weeks no fix. They however keep sending adds and commercials oll over the internet asking people to buy a product which is not working (at least with this database, not sure about others).

I have to say I have never seen more careless software company. Microsoft is getting close, but still not there.
On one hand I know that public criticizing them will simply decrease their customer base (which is not god for any of us), on the other hand it is super hard to create projects having to deal with such an unreliable product.

What amazes me the most , is the fact that they are SUPER STUBORN, to fix super simple issue, which would take only a few minutes. There are plenty of them and all these minor problems could be fixed of improved in a matter of day or two.

some bugs are hard to find/fix the cause, but some are rather simple.

I have learned that commenting and complaining here makes no difference. Netmake does no check this forum at all (unless there is some major problem). The only way that could possibly work is when the users will flood their mailboxes with complains, but this would have to be consolidated grouip action. I might be even wrong on that because like it has been said here many times, it is also a matter of menthality. Some people are raised that way - which is being careless and have a mess all around them all the time. It does not bother them.

1 Like
#6

I believe this forum is in ENGLSIH, isn’t it ?

#7

Sure?
I don’t see in the the terms of service that you have to write in english

Terms of Service - Scriptcase

Seguro?
No veo en los términos del servicio que estés obligado a escribir en inglés.
saludos

2 Likes
#8 
function translateText($text, $sourceLanguage = 'es', $targetLanguage = 'en') {
$apiKey = 'API KEY'; 

$url = "https://translation.googleapis.com/language/translate/v2";


$data = [
    'q' => $text,
    'source' => $sourceLanguage, 
    'target' => $targetLanguage, 
];


$ch = curl_init();
curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_URL, $url . "?key=" . $apiKey);
curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_POST, true);
curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_RETURNTRANSFER, true);
curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_HTTPHEADER, [
    'Content-Type: application/json',
]);
curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_POSTFIELDS, json_encode($data));

$response = curl_exec($ch);

if (curl_errno($ch)) {
    echo 'Error en cURL: ' . curl_error($ch);
    curl_close($ch);
    return null;
}

curl_close($ch);


$responseData = json_decode($response, true);

return $responseData['data']['translations'][0]['translatedText'] ?? null;
}
1 Like
#9

I totally agree, I’ve been waiting for six months for this error to be fixed.

#10

i could easily miss all the updates from the last 2-3 years, while the basics are still not ok.

  • using links in the applications, has so many differences/inconsistencies.
  • summary is a nightmare, there is not separate group by for the summary. i mean , common, SC positions itself as a rapid business intelligence application/features

i could easily spend a day with a SC to walk trough missing features and double their sales.
SC does not want to earn money :slight_smile: what can we do about it :slight_smile: ?

#11

Hi @maximnl. The only thing is to Stop renewing our licenses. The power of money is infinite.

Best regards.

1 Like
#12

That would be true, but SC mainly focuses on selling new licenses afaik. Many of us have a large codebase and migrating to a competitor is not always easy, thus kind of vendor lock in…

But it is doable, as we did as aducom, but took a few years. As university of Groningen, with our team it is a huge challenge.

1 Like
#13

app developement changed a lot with AI and code generation features, i hope SC does make a few good decisions in the new year. Nice holidays everyone.

#14

I’m curious. AI helped me in some cases, but it cannot write me a full program without having my full specs. So far I could find most of the given answers somehow in GitHub. To me, it has still a way to go and is - kind of - copy machine in a ‘clever way’. I really don’t see hoe it can help SC, and certainly will not find solutions for the many bugs. But who knows, someday. Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to all of you.

#15

You can wait a long time for that, I complained about it years ago, but apparently it still hasn’t been fixed!

#16

In my opinion the root cause is that the NETMAKE management does not really care about expanding the product in any way. I have not seen ONE MAJOR FEATURE implemented in recent 5 years or so. They adding little bells and wisthels but it is not what most DEVs expect. They also have their own evaluation plan for what is needed, based whic h costs less to implement, instead of “when will generate more revenue”. Threfore they do not listen to Devs. It is kinda inernal philosophy, which is not really very beneficial for both parties.
I could criticize SC on line on million things, but I do not do this because I think this will decrease user base and make this forum user list shring down even more.

There is also the menthality problem. Not sure if this is NETMAKE only or Brasil, or something else. They are simply very careless. I have this feeling from the very beginning. They do not pay attention to details and ignore things which are super simple to fix or implement.

Bare in mind that most of them (I think) come from the CEO’s. IF their DEV wants to spend time on something (which could fix some minot issue in 1 hr), but the manager says “No, … you do something else…”, then this DEV goes and does something else. So if the orders and directions come from the very top wrong way, then no wonder that it all looks like a mess.