Working with Laravel

Hello,

I would like to use Scriptcase, but I am unsure how to use in conjunction with Laravel php framework.

For instance, in Laravel, I have Eloquent models that perform actions when saving or updating. If I write directly to the database using Scriptcase, those actions won’t be performed.

Anyone figure out an elegant way to tie the two together. If Scriptcase could do that, it would really be amazing and open up a lot of opportunities for people that want a gui tool integrated into their current frameworks.

Thanks!

I dont think so. SC is perfect to use with third party or external scripts, but not in partnership with MVC nor complete frameworks like laravel, synfony and so on

yeah, that’s what i thought. if scriptcase could eventually make an adapter, I think it would really be great for them. I believe a lot of people would love that integration as it’s painful to build quality crud forms in any type of mvc.

Interesting? Yes. Important? Not IMHO. Laravel integration costs a lot of work, and I think there are a lot of better things to do prior to this.

  • Change iFrame technique for Divs.
  • Pull out table HTML tag
  • Macros to work with containers.
  • Automatic prod enviroment (prod enviroment just containing what you need).
  • Better reutilization of code (a lot of generated code is repetitive on each generated application, this can be solved with good refactoring and using inheritance
  • And I can continue…

SC is a great product as is without competitor, and could be better with some important changes. Integration with third party frameworks is very hard, and unnecesary imho, but I get your point.

Amen Giuseppe.

De acuerdo.
Giu +1

[QUOTE=alvagar;34932]De acuerdo.
Giu +1[/QUOTE]

  • 0.99. Leave the html table tag. See bootstrap docs :wink:

Some directr link please?

Giu…

http://www.w3schools.com/bootstrap/bootstrap_tables.asp

[QUOTE=aducom;34941]Giu…

http://www.w3schools.com/bootstrap/bootstrap_tables.asp[/QUOTE]

Oh I got it now, but not, I’m not talking about this. I’m speaking about theming. Almost all SC templates are builded using Tables, and this is a bad practice

Captura.JPG

every customer has a different use case. maybe not important to you, but it is important to me. i’d like to see all the features you mentioned done as well.

And I understand your point, and for this reason I wrote… “Interesting? Yes. Important? Not IMHO

But new features should be under demand. and I’m almost totally sure thath not more than 20% or less of SC userbase needs integration with external frameworks. For this reason, I see it interesting? Absolutly, but it’s worth? I don’t think so

I think integration might come… when we have enough demand for it.

+1 in demanding integration with external theeming products.

Albert, do you mean you can somehow replace the default look of SC tables to look like bootstrap? How?

That will only be possible if SC is adopting bootstrap. Currently that’s not the case.

Also before adding new functionality, they should ensure 95% bug free what already exists.

  1. Move to current version of PHP
  2. Move to current version of jQuery (this will help mobile a lot)
  3. Fix versioning
  4. Fix PDFs
  5. Numerous other bugs

Only then entertain adding functionality

@dave, I agree…