Looks good!
But… “it was a lot of work”… I go with Marcos. This is a low-code tool. I don’t want to bend in all direction to get something implemented that should be part of the product? Again, looks good, but it is still a work-around… On the other hand, great that it is possible.
I agree with you, but I couldn’t wait for a new SC menu anymore!!! It was a hard work? Yes!! But it was made just once!!! Now I have my own menu working well in all devices and I cannot deny that SC gave me this possibility too. So IMHO if you can wait for a new menu from Netmake, fine. If you can’t, you can create your own (even using SC to this) and go ahead. It’s up to you!!
Beautiful menus Kleyber…wish you could sell it as an Add On to SC…
They did a youtube demo of a menu based on a javascript framework , i believe using a react sidebar component
So anyone experimented with RADSYSTEMS already? How it behaves versus SC?
I agree RAD offers comparable functionalities, their page filter component look actually nicer than the refined search in SC.
Pricing in RAD is also a factor 2 lower. @iaxhost has a point here.
Yes I’ve seen it, but the apps does not open in tabs. That’s what I did in my menu, as SC’s menu does.
the problem is always that something external more or less solves the problem… but always more or less, there is always something that doesn’t work perfectly with external integrations.
with very little effort netmake could integrate everything natively into SC without patching external libraries.
external libraries are only useful for really particular things, not to make up for netmake laziness!!
In my case, it solved completely my need… there is nothing more or less with my menu. So, Netmake can create its own menu that I don’t care. As I said in one of my previous posts, it’s up to you.
could you describe how you open links in SC tabs?
I asked SC a few times , but there is no standard of doing it (big sc_redir macro)
I don’t use SC tabs, my menu has it natively, using JS.
thanks all, nice topic. i have a different approach for a verical menu, but i don’t know how to do the same for a horizontal one.
<?php works fine and quick but bo idea is their a similar way for a horizontal menu. any sugestions? ?>
#css3menut{width:350px;}
.jstree-container-ul jstree-no-dots jstree-wholerow-ul{width:215px;}
.scMenuTTable{background-color:#fff !important;}
.scMenuTItems{
font-weight: normal;
padding: 0px 10px 0px 10px;
color:#fff !important;
}
.scMenuTSubItems {
font-weight: normal !important;
padding: 0px 10px 0px 10px;
color:#626689 !important;
}
.jstree-default .jstree-anchor{padding:11px;}
.jstree-default .jstree-node {margin-left:0px !important;}
.jstree-default .jstree-wholerow {
height:30px !important;
padding:23px;
}
.jstree-default>.jstree-no-dots .jstree-open>.jstree-ocl {margin-top:11.8px;}
.jstree-default>.jstree-no-dots .jstree-closed>.jstree-ocl {margin-top:11.8px;}
.jstree-wholerow-ul .jstree-wholerow{background-color:#626689 !important;border-right:1px solid #D8D8D8}
.jstree-children .jstree-wholerow {
background-color:#fff;
border-width:1px !important;
border-color:#D8D8D8 !important;
border-style:solid !important;
}
.jstree-children .jstree-wholerow-hovered {background-color:#415972 !important;}
.scMenuTItems > .jstree-wholerow {background-color:#fff !important;}
.scMenuTItems > .jstree-wholerow-hovered {background-color:#CAE1FF !important;}
You can do this way
Regards
You are off point, I mentioned the menu as an example, I already solved my problem but its a hard work because I have to solve (all problems) and that’s painful, I need a responsive design for dashboard, grids, forms, solve problem of master/detail because my client can not understand why the detail is blank while he click (New) button? because he can see other software working normally like that, with JavaScript you can solve that problem but why not this basic things not available in the framework, its a low code framework so it should help me in this not wasting my time trying to solve basic problem, I understand that all what I am talking about need time for implementation but not 10 years!
Dear Netmake.
Why I am going to waste my time in something that should be native in the framework it self?
Why there are some bugs that had been reported years ago but still exist?
Why a great framework like SC still using tables instead of fluid code?
Thank you very much for all members of this forum for making this thread important and visible to Netmake.
Thank you very much Albert.
Also, the applications open behind the menu, not beside, and don’t resize when menu open or closed.
hi,
the problem is precisely this, not all the solutions that we can build are perfectly integrated with SC, it should be Netmake that integrates the things most requested by its customers into the product.
I understand that you may have had positive experiences with Radsystems, and it is great to know that you have found a solution that works for you. However, it is not appropriate to constantly redirect users in this Scriptcase forum to the competitor’s website instead of suggesting solutions within the context of Scriptcase.
As a community, we are all committed to finding solutions and improving Scriptcase. We are aware that all software have their own issues, and Scriptcase is no exception. However, it is important to also consider the time and monetary investments that have been made in Scriptcase. Instead of suggesting a switch to a different platform, let’s focus on finding solutions within the context of Scriptcase and making the most of the resources we have.
I would like to remind you that the purpose of this forum is to discuss Scriptcase and its issues, and to share ideas on how to improve it. By redirecting users to Radsystems, you are not only suggesting a switch to a different platform, but also discouraging users to share their ideas and solutions for Scriptcase issues.
I would appreciate it if you could refrain from redirecting users to Radsystems in the future and instead suggest solutions within the context of Scriptcase. Let’s work together to improve this platform and make the most of our investment in it. By doing so, we can make Scriptcase a better system for everyone.
Thank you.
A good answer. Every software has some advantages and some problems. I have an application with more than 500 Grids/Forms and some thousand users on the database and it works !! SC works now with PHP 8.1 . Very fast. Other software has not yet done this step. And often we have an update to resolve issues. I know other software where you have to wait for month before an update is offered. At least concerning the layout, some other software may be nicer … but perhaps not so stable and fast and easy in development…
I will not change o another software … with other problems …
Best regards
Uwe Pfeiffer
SC works now with PHP 8.1 . Very fastI have a SaaS software built in SC, the loading time is huge because of simple thing: every application (for example one form) has a folder that contains 42 files! Yes 42 files!!! Because my customers always complains of the loading time (specially master/detail) I forced to rebuild the software in another low code framework, at that time I went to AwareIM, its Java but its the best option for me, the price is too high, but comparing to the production and quality and stability it was perfect, and in 1 week I finished and the product working without any problem.
Other software has not yet done this step. And often we have an update to resolve issuesTotally wrong, checkout AwareIM https://www.awareim.com/ Some bugs fixed within 24 hours, most of them fixed in 72 hours maximum.
At least concerning the layout, some other software may be nicer … but perhaps not so stable and fast and easy in developmentAgain, totally wrong and based on assumptions!
I still love SC, still have old projects that make me shouting here, I made a payment on the first week of January, but if this year ended as the last year I will left it forever, simply because I am losing my clients.
I still believe that SC is the one of the BEST PHP RADs in the market but the problem is Netmake.