Responsive Template for SC8

I just created a new project with SC v8.1
Tired to open it on my phone - LOOKS TERRIBLE! it seems like none of the Responsive Design in SC8.1 works. I do not know what kind of job Net Make has done with the mobile implementation but I see it is not working for me (I’m using phone with Andorid KitKat).

ARTHUR

[B]Just a test

asdasd[/B]

I don’t know your project, but I have recently created one using a 8.0 theme and to be honest, it works great and well. Both on Android 4.2 as IOS (IPhone).

Albert, will you share the details with us?

And do you think the developers of ScriptCase will soon create a version that dynamically, before files are generated, offers a selection of frameworks first, such as Foundation, Bootstrap, JS Query with Styling files?

And at any time the features that are native to the framework, or that can be added by a JS file, can be selected before Re-Generating the application files?

Thank you!

Well to share, the only thing I did was to setup the mobile menu which is a separate tab. After that it worked well and nice. But only on a V8 theme. Be aware that you have to take the small screen into account if you use broad grids. But besides that the application looked smooth and neat.

I also have that same question. It is extremely difficult to integrate a Script-case form into a Joomla Bootstrap template. As the screen gets smaller the form overflows the borders. Look unprofessional and the Public moans about its mobile compatibility. Can Script-case Urgently look at the Bootstrap and J-Query integration?

Hello everyone, last year I developed a project in sc8.
Before my customer wanted only the version for desktop, in December asked the mobile version, initially I tried to use the template SC8 mobile, but unfortunately they are not exceptional and they have many problems in terms of graphics and aesthetics, the template SC8 Mobile not responsive to 100%.

In the end I had to rewrite almost all the code for the version Mobile, I rewrote effective menu for mobile 100% responsive, all Grid Pictures and Video I have rewritten from 0.
In a few words SC8 for Mobile version I kept only some form.
This is a big problem most customers require effective mobile version.

In all cases SC8 Netmake is very powerful for the DeskTop version, lacking only a mobile version.

It is not a problem of costs, if Netmake sells an efficient version of SC8, I would buy immediately.

I hope Netmake is working for a new mobile version efficient and that it is responsive to 100%.

The reason why I wrote almost all the mobile code is because the tablet Netmake force a DeskTop version, in this case the ‘’ application is virtually unusable, huge problem is also the sc8 fonts that do not adapt to the various mobile devices.

I forgot, also APP tabs I had to completely rewrite because the SC8 version is not dynamic.

Mmmm, I wrote a mobile application which is responsive and works well. But you have to use the SC8.x themes for that. The older themes are not responsive. Also you need to apply the mobile menu, I tend to forget that sometimes.

Hello Aducom, I used the new themes of SC8, but they are very limited, now customers are demanding much more layout such as bootstrap.
Even the menu is very limited on mobile, tabs are not dynamic, etc…
In all cases I really like SC8, I have tried many systems development for the Desktop Applications SC8 is the best, unfortunately I had to rewrite several parts for mobile applications.

I agree…

hii can I use this html5 template listed in this websites : http://themesiter.com/

No, you can only use the themes in SC or you need to migrate/convert this theme into SC using the tools available in the development system.

Albert, migrate/convert? you mean re-invent it again!! and what tools you mean available in the development system?

Albert, migrate/convert? you mean re-invent it again!! and what tools you mean available in the development system?

Albert, migrate/convert? you mean re-invent it again!! and what tools you mean available in the development system?

You can create templates, and themes. It requires a lot of fiddling but that’s always when you dive into stylesheets.So if you need to create a theme like some kind of template you find on the web you can come close, but it will require a lot of time.

For that agree, i thought there is something else like other themes can be created easily or ready to import out of the box, well, i still guess these SC guys have big room for imporevement, like to allow for example plugins import and allow others to contribute… this way is win-win for all they get their product expand with less effort from their side along with others who know the how-to let them work and ask for small fees why not!? just thinking… because that time required for average user to adjust things will be very very long… while other users can invest in this directions and provide cross share benefits… i don’t know, just thinking

cheers

There is no doubt that responsive layout is where the next big battle is for ScriptCase and many other tools. Hopefully, they will come up with something making it easier to have a satisfactory responsive front end.

In my projects (and I assume for many ScriptCase projects in general), there are much LOB (Line of Business) functionality where a user will despise having a mobile or a tablet for their work. They are using big monitors, and often more than one, as they need to see many columns and applications at the same time. For these users not having a responsive design matters not at all. However, there will often be parts of a project with a more narrow functionality meant for general users (possibly external customers) that will be using tablets and/or mobile phones.

More to the point, I have a project where parts of it need to be with such a responsive design. Thus, I am wondering if it would be worthwhile to see if we could have some kind of collaboration on this and create a few shared templates and/or themes that could be useful. On the other hand, If ScriptCase were to release features or a tool for responsive front end design within the next 3 to 6 month, it would perhaps be better to wait for that. Has anyone heard anything in that regard?